Friday, December 02, 2005

The King with Four Wives


Once upon a time....there was a rich king who had four wives. He loved the fourth wife the most and adorned her with rich robes and treated her to the finest delicacies. He gave her nothing but the best. He also loved the third wife very much and showed her off to neighboring kingdoms. However, he feared that one day she would leave him for another.

He also loved the second wife. She was his confidante and was always kind, considerate and patient with him. Whenever the King faced a problem, he could confide in her to help him get through the difficult times.

The King's first wife was a very loyal partner and had made great contributions in maintaining his wealth and kingdom. However, he did not love the first wife and although she loved him deeply, he hardly took notice of her. One day, the King fell ill and he knew that his time was short.

Thus, he asked the 4th wife, "I have loved you the most, endowed you with the finest clothing and showered great care over you. Now that I'm dying, will you follow me and keep me company?"

"No way!" replied the 4th wife and she walked away without another word. Her answer cut like a sharp knife right into his heart.

The sad King asked the 3rd wife, "I have loved you all my life. Now that I'm dying, will you follow me and keep me company?"

"No!" replied the 3rd wife. "Life is too good! When you die, I am going to remarry!" His heart sank and turned cold.

He then asked the 2nd wife, "I have always turned to you for help and you've always been there for me. When I die, will you follow me and keep me company?"

"I'm sorry, I can't help you out this time!" replied the 2nd wife. "At the very most, I can only send you to your grave." Her answer came like a bolt of thunder and the King was devastated.

Then a voice called out: "I'll leave with you and follow you no matter where you go."

The King looked up and there was his first wife. She was so skinny, because she suffered from malnutrition. Greatly grieved, the King said, "I should have taken better care of you when I had the chance!"


In Truth, we all have four wives in our lives:

Our 4th wife is our body. No matter how much time and effort we lavish in making it look great, it'll leave us when we die.

Our 3rd wife is our possessions, status and wealth. When we die it all goes to others.

Our 2nd wife is our family and friends. No matter how much they have been there for us, the furthest they can stay by us is up to the grave.

Our 1st wife is our Soul, often neglected in pursuit of wealth, power and pleasures of the ego. However, our Soul is the only thing that will follow us wherever we go. So cultivate, strengthen and cherish it now! It is your greatest gift to offer the world.

Tuesday, November 15, 2005

Peter Drucker, Leading Management Guru, Dies at 95



Nov. 11 (Bloomberg) -- Peter Drucker, the organization consultant whose clear thinking and engaging analysis made him the leading management guru to many of the world's biggest companies, has died. He was 95.

Drucker died this morning, Claremont Graduate University said in a statement. Drucker was the Marie Rankin Clarke Professor of Social Sciences and Management at the Claremont, California-based school from 1971 to 2003.

The Austria-born journalist and intellectual taught, wrote and advised companies on management techniques for seven decades, completing his 35th book at age 94. His wide-ranging lectures captivated audiences from Japanese executives to U.S. college students, and he was respected if not revered by top executives who sought his counsel.

Accolades poured in when Forbes featured Drucker in a 1997 cover story.

``He makes you think,'' Jack Welch, then-chairman of General Electric Co., told the magazine, while Intel co-founder Andrew Grove declared, ``Drucker is a hero of mine. He writes and thinks with exquisite clarity -- a standout among a bunch of muddled fad mongers.''

Drucker had a good eye for things to come. In the early 1950s, he predicted the importance of computers, and in the 1960s, he foresaw Japan's rise as an industrial power. In 1997, he was prescient about a backlash to executive pay, saying, ``In the next economic downturn there will be an outbreak of bitterness and contempt for the super-corporate chieftains who pay themselves millions.''

Informed by History

His analysis was always informed by history, as befit a man who was born when the Hapsburgs still had an empire and Vienna was brimming with some of the most gifted thinkers and achievers in Europe.

Drucker's curiosity, charm, voracious reading and seeming command of subjects as diverse as psychology, Asian art, musicology and British novels made him ``one of the last of the encyclopaedists, contemptuous of the hyperspecialization of modern academia,'' as John Micklethwait and Adrian Wooldridge wrote in ``The Witch Doctors,'' their 1996 book about management gurus.

Drucker, they said, was ``determined to know everything about everything.''

Early Success

Drucker came to the U.S. in 1937 as a freelance journalist. He had worked briefly in banking and held a Ph.D in international and public law from Frankfurt University. Just two years later, he won acclaim for his first book, ``The End of Economic Man,'' which skewered fascism and was reviewed by Winston Churchill in the Times Literary Supplement in London.

A second book, ``The Future of Industrial Man,'' explored his thesis that large corporations would provide the framework for social change. The book struck a chord at General Motors Corp., where senior executives invited Drucker to study the company's inner workings.

``Concept of the Corporation,'' published in 1946, became one of his most celebrated works and cast the die for his career as a management consultant and lecturer.

Drucker, who became a naturalized U.S. citizen in 1943, taught at Sarah Lawrence College, Bennington College and New York University before joining the faculty of the Claremont Graduate School in California in 1972. The School of Management there took his name in 1987.

Long Career

In 2004, Drucker was slowed by a broken hip and acute loss of hearing. Still, he continued to write in his unpretentious suburban house in Claremont, which he shared with Doris Schmitz Drucker, his wife of almost 70 years.

He wrote articles for the Harvard Business Review and the Wall Street Journal, and he saw his 35th book published. ``The Daily Drucker: 366 Days of Insight and Motivation for Getting the Right Things Done,'' was co-written with Joseph A. Maciariello, a faculty colleague.

``If I were to summarize what I see when I look at his work, I would go to his own citing of a term from Goethe's Faust: `Born to see meant to look,''' said Maciariello, 63. ``He had this passion to look at the future that is already present, at the trends that were going to shape society that were already evident in the bud.''

Making a Point

Drucker wasn't always right. In 1949, he wrote that postwar mass production had ``dethroned the ruling groups of bourgeois society itself: the merchants, bankers, capitalists.'' He also predicted, incorrectly, that the nation's financial center would move to Washington from New York.

The Wall Street Journal researched several of his lectures in 1987 and reported that some of his anecdotes were factually flawed. As an example, Drucker was incorrect when he told an audience that English is the official language for all employees at Japan's Mitsui trading company.

When the Journal asked Drucker about its findings, he replied, ``I use anecdotes to make a point, not to write history.''

Peter Ferdinand Drucker was born in Vienna on Nov. 19, 1909, to Caroline and Adolph Bertram Drucker, a well-educated couple whose circle included the city's leading intellectuals, artists, musicians and professionals.

Vienna Suburb

Drucker's mother held a medical degree and his father was an economist and lawyer who, for many years, was a senior civil servant at the Austrian Ministry of Economics. They lived in a stylish duplex home in a Vienna suburb, where Peter Drucker and his younger brother Gerhart could see the Vienna Woods from their bedroom windows.

Adolph Drucker routinely invited economists and civil servants to a dinner party on Mondays, while his wife hosted a medical dinner later in the week. Other dinners focused on physics, mathematics and music.

Peter Drucker's paternal grandmother was an accomplished pianist who had played for Johannes Brahms as a girl, and much later, for Mahler at a charity concert.

In his 1978 memoir, ``Adventures of a Bystander,'' Drucker wrote about the teachers and intellectuals who influenced him in his younger years. He devoted one chapter to Sigmund Freud, who was an older acquaintance of his parents.

Bored in School

Classroom instruction paled in comparison to Drucker's interesting home life. Drucker claimed he encountered only two first-rate teachers, and those were sisters who taught fourth grade. One taught him to set goals and organize, while the other inspired children with warmth and laughter and taught her privileged pupils -- boys and girls alike -- to sew, pound nails and saw wood, which was unorthodox instruction at the time.

Drucker skipped fifth grade to become the youngest student in the entering class of the local Gymnasium, but he found Latin recitations and the teachers deadly dull.

Later, he said he learned to teach himself, relying on the methods and joy he experienced in fourth grade. By the time he was 14, he was determined to skip college and leave Austria, which he found depressingly mired in the past.

``I would be an adult among adults-I had never liked being young, and detested the company of delayed adolescents as I thought most college students to be,'' Drucker wrote in his memoir. ``I would earn a living and be financially independent.''

Off to Germany

Drucker found a job as a trainee in an export firm in Hamburg in 1927. He appeased his father by enrolling at Hamburg University, but discovered that there were no evening classes he could attend. Instead, he spent many hours reading in the city library, and also managed to publish two papers, including one that predicted in September 1929 that the New York stock market would continue to soar.

When the crash occurred weeks later, Drucker said he learned his lesson and never again predicted the stock markets' movement.

The Great Crash also eliminated the job he had just secured in Frankfort to train to become a security analyst. But he was soon hired as a financial reporter at the Frankfurter General- Anzeiger, a lively afternoon paper that his wife later described as ``middlebrow.''

Promotions came quickly, in part because World War I had decimated the ranks of able-bodied men who would have preceded him. Drucker became the senior editor in charge of foreign and economic news in 1931, the same year he completed a doctorate in international and public law at Frankfurt University.

Drucker also did some substitute teaching for a law professor, and met his future wife, Doris Schmidt, in one of those classes.

Fled Hitler

Drucker had vowed in 1932 to leave Germany if Hitler came to power. He acted on that promise in early 1933 after he watched a Nazi official take over a university faculty meeting to fire Jewish professors and bar them from the campus. Drucker was sickened by most colleagues' timidity, and he resigned from his newspaper, even though a Nazi party representative offered to promote him.

Drucker moved to London, where he eventually was hired as an executive secretary to the partners of a merchant bank. Shortly after his arrival, he recognized Doris Schmidt in the Piccadilly Underground station and called to her as the two rode escalators moving in opposite directions.

She had moved to London because of the futility of pursuing a law degree in Frankfurt, due to her Jewish ancestry. The two resumed their friendship.

His Marriage

``Both of us were lonely in an essentially xenophobic environment,'' Doris Drucker wrote in her 2004 memoir entitled ``Invent Radium or I'll Pull Your Hair.'' ``We were in despair over the worsening situation in Germany -- and frightened by the apathy and the unwillingness of the British to see through Hitler's dangerous game plan.''

The friendship turned into romance even amid the initial opposition of their mothers. Doris Schmidt's mother was fiercely ambitious for her daughter, and wanted her to match the accomplishments of a Madame Curie, ideally marrying a Rothschild along the way. Drucker's mother preferred a wealthy Englishwoman as a prospective daughter-in-law over a penniless German.

According to her memoir, the courtship stretched over four years because marriage would have cost Doris her job. During the Depression, working women in Great Britain were routinely fired if they married, with the idea that the jobs might go to unemployed men.

On to America

Discouraged by the British appeasement of Hitler, and eager to wed, the two finally married on Jan. 16, 1937, and set sail for New York.

Their first-class passage was a wedding gift from Drucker's merchant bank employers. Before his departure, Drucker arranged to work as a freelance writer for a group of British newspapers, and he also agreed to serve as a U.S. adviser to some British investors.

The newlyweds settled in the New York suburb of Bronxville, where Drucker wrote his first two books. His wife gave birth to a daughter, Kathleen Romola, and son, Vincent. Two other daughters, Cecily Anne and Joan Agatha, would follow.

Drucker taught economics and statistics one day a week at Sarah Lawrence College in Bronxville. In 1942, he accepted a fulltime appointment at Bennington College in Vermont because he was offered the freedom ``to teach whatever subjects I thought I needed learning in: political theory and American government, American history and economic history, philosophy and religion,'' as Drucker wrote in ``Adventures of a Bystander.''

Bennington also gave him the freedom to work as a consultant and to spend two years on his research at General Motors. In their memoirs, both Drucker and his wife spoke fondly of Vermont, where they lived for seven years.

Charitable Work

The family moved to Montclair, New Jersey, when Drucker was offered a teaching job at Columbia University in 1949. That job fell through, but a chance encounter with an old friend led to an offer to become a professor of management at New York University's fledgling Graduate School of Management.

Drucker taught there for more than 20 years until he relocated to California in 1972.

Throughout his career, Drucker made a point of working with charities and non-profit institutions, such as the Girl Scouts of America, hospitals, churches and universities, because he believed that good management is vital to all aspects of life. The Wall Street Journal reported that by 1987, Drucker was devoting half of his consulting hours without charge.

``His life and work, as I see it, was devoted to creating a functioning society,'' Maciariello said. ``He is truly one of the most influential people of the 20th century.''

Survivors include his wife, Doris, four children and six grandchildren.

Saturday, November 12, 2005

Traditions of India


India is a country where a variety of ancient traditions are being observed, most of the time, rather blindly without modern insight. Some of the traditions, no doubt, look ridiculous in the eye of the modern man.

Let me give a couple of examples to underscore this point. K.P.S. Menon, the former Ambassador, had written about this in the Illustrated Weekly of India. It seems, he had once visited a Palghat Namboodiri family where a luncheon was arranged. While he sat on the floor in front of the plantain leaf, in a row, along with others, he saw a young Brahmin boy walk across carrying a pestle (vanake) and placing it in a corner of the hall. Being curious, Menon asked the guests sitting to his left and right, the purpose of keeping the pestle in the corner. He drew a blank but pursued his enquiry after lunch with some elderly persons.

The answer he got stunned him beyond belief. A venerable old Namboodiri Brahmin told Menon that in the early years of his youth, on such special occasions of lunch or dinner, just as salt is served, a small toothpick would also be kept on each leaf for the convenience of the guests in case of need. This had become a tradition, but with the passage of time they found it unnecessary to provide each one a toothpick. But, how about the tradition? So, as a symbolic act they placed a pestle which looked like the enlarged version of a toothpick, so to say, on behalf of everybody.

True, it is ridiculous but it is the tradition. I am sure, now they must have discarded this tradition totally, as irrelevant to the modern times. Apparently, they must have got the proper insight into their ancient traditions.

I could also give another example. There was a person who performed puja, offering Naivaidya, food items, to his personal deity (Manedevaru). Since the cat in his house came and nibbled at the naivaidya, thereby making it unfit for offering to the deity, he used to tie the cat to a nearby pole till his puja was over. This continued for many years until one day he died.

Following his death, the duty of performing the puja fell on his son and he too, without questioning the tradition, continued to tie the cat to the nearby pole while performing puja. If the cat is not around, he would go looking for it, bring it and tie it up thinking this was part of the ritual. Apparently, the son did not have any modern insight to the ancient tradition. It seems when the cat died he procured another cat to continue the tradition! He did not know that the old order changeth, or should change, yielding place to new.

I guess, Mahatma Gandhi will make a very good example as a person who had perfect insight into our ancient traditions. Consider the tools and ideas he used to mobilise the freedom fighters to drive away the British rulers. Immediately, I can think of just four of his ideas, though there may be many. The four ideas are: 1. Non-violence or Satyagraha (Non-resistance to the law enforcing authority). 2. The prayer meeting. 3. The Charaka (Spinning wheel). 4. Becoming a naked Fakir, to use the term used by Sir Winston Churchill to describe Gandhi. All these four ideas were derived, no doubt, from our own ancient traditions laid down in our sacred scriptures.

Thursday, October 27, 2005



Horoscope Compatibility

Horoscope Compatibility for Aquarius
Perfect Partners: Gemini, Libra
Nearly Perfect Partners: Aries, Sagittarius
Not Your Destiny: Taurus, Scorpio

Horoscope Compatibility for Pisces
Perfect Partners: Cancer, Scorpio
Nearly Perfect Partners: Taurus, Capricorn
Not Your Destiny: Gemini, Sagittarius

Horoscope Compatibility for Aries
Perfect Partners: Leo, Sagittarius
Nearly Perfect Partners: Gemini, Aquarius
Not Your Destiny: Cancer, Capricorn

Horoscope Compatibility for Taurus
Perfect Partners: Virgo, Capricorn
Nearly Perfect Partners: Cancer, Pisces
Not Your Destiny: Leo, Aquarius

Horoscope Compatibility for Gemini
Perfect Partners: Libra, Aquarius
Nearly Perfect Partners: Aries, Leo
Not Your Destiny: Virgo, Pisces

Horoscope Compatibility for Cancer
Perfect Partners: Scorpio, Pisces
Nearly Perfect Partners: Taurus, Virgo
Not Your Destiny: Aries, Libra

Horoscope Compatibility for Leo
Perfect Partners: Aries, Sagittarius
Nearly Perfect Partners: Gemini, Libra
Not Your Destiny: Scorpio, Taurus

Horoscope Compatibility for Virgo
Perfect Partners: Taurus, Capricorn
Nearly Perfect Partners: Cancer, Scorpio
Not Your Destiny: Gemini, Sagittarius

Horoscope Compatibility for Libra
Perfect Partners: Gemini, Aquarius
Nearly Perfect Partners: Leo, Sagittarius
Not Your Destiny: Cancer, Capricorn

Horoscope Compatibility for Scorpio
Perfect Partners: Cancer, Pisces
Nearly Perfect Partners: Virgo, Capricorn
Not Your Destiny: Leo, Aquarius

Horoscope Compatibility for Sagittarius
Perfect Partners: Aries, Leo
Nearly Perfect Partners: Libra, Aquarius
Not Your Destiny: Virgo, Pisces

Horoscope Compatibility for Capricorn
Perfect Partners: Taurus, Virgo
Nearly Perfect Partners: Scorpio, Pisces
Not Your Destiny: Aries, Libra

Wednesday, October 26, 2005

Internet2

The second generation of the Internet, developed by a consortium of more than 200 universities, private companies and the U.S. government. It was not developed for commercial use or to replace the Internet, but is the reincarnation of it, intended primarily for research. Whereas the Internet was first designed to exchange text, Internet2 is designed for full-motion video and 3D animations.

Originally named UCAID (University Corporation for Advanced Internet Development), Internet2 spawned the high-speed Abilene backbone.

Internet2 is a non-profit consortium which develops and deploys advanced network applications and technologies, mostly for high-speed data transfer. It is led by 207 US universities and partners from the networking and technology industries (such as AT&T, Intel, Sun Microsystems, and Cisco Systems). Some of the technologies it has developed include IPv6, IP multicasting and quality of service.

Internet2 members created the Abilene Network and are a major supporter of the National LambdaRail project.

Mislabeling of Internet2

In light of a recent series of lawsuits filed by the RIAA against university students attending several of the major participants in Abilene, there has been a recent trend in the media to report on a network called "Internet2." Some sources go so far as to suggest Internet2 is a network wholly separate from the Internet. This is misleading since Internet2 is in fact a consortium and not a computer network. It is possible that many news sources have adopted the term Internet2 because it seems like a logical name for a next-generation Internet backbone. Articles that reference Internet2 as a network are in fact referring to the previously mentioned Internet backbone known as the Abilene Network. This forms a high speed backbone by deploying many of the technologies developed by Internet2. Abilene is not an isolated network and its members are usually accessible in some way through the public Internet.

The official website of Internet2 clearly states what the consortium is and its purpose on their "about" page. (http://www.internet2.edu/about/)

Tuesday, October 25, 2005

what is the next Economy going to be?

The
Bio-Economy


Dr Stan M Davis

Learning Curve
Bio economy as the successor to information economy
Biotechnology as driver of the bio-economy era
Overlap of info-technology and biotechnology will digitize many biological processes
Industries to be infused by the bio-economy era



The next economy is gestating right now. What will it be about? The bets have already been placed and the results are in: biotechnology will be the great wave after information technologies.
It will begin in areas like pharmaceuticals and agriculture and, ultimately, spread throughout every economic sector, just as computers did before. This article gives you a feel for what this next economy — the true economy of most of the twenty-first century — will be like.
Lesson from the future: Biotechnology today is where computer technology was in the 1960s. Its impact will be enormous and, unless you plan to retire within the next decade, start to understand it now. We did not realize that we were no longer living in an industrial economy for about twenty years, from the early 1950s to the early 1970s. When we finally figured out the old economy had exited, we did not know what to call the new one. Post-industrial? Service? Shopping and gathering? Information won the title. Get ready for d'eja' vu all over again. Like everything else, all economies have beginnings and endings and we can already see the end of this one a few decades hence.
Hunting-and-gathering economies ruled for hundreds of thousands of years before they were overshadowed by agrarian economies, which ruled about 10,000 years. Next came the industrial ones. The first began in Britain in the 1760s and the first to finish unwinding in the USA in the early 1950s. We are halfway through the information economy and, from start to finish, it will last 75 to 80 years, ending in the late 2020s. Then get ready for the next one: the bio-economy.
Life circles for people and plants, for businesses, industries economies, and entire civilizations have four distinct quarters: gestation, growth, maturity, and decline. The internet is the main even of the information economy's mature quarter, the last phase of it being marked by the widespread use of cheap chips and wireless technology that will let everything connect to everything else. Life circles overlap. So the information economy will mature in the years ahead as the bio-economy completes its gestation and finally takes off into its growth quarter during the 2020s.
The bio-economy opened for business in 1953, when Francis Crick and James Watson identified the double-helix structure of DNA. The bio-economy has been in its first quarter ever since and completion and publication of the decoded of the human genome marks the end of this gestation period.

We are halfway through the information economy and, from start to finish, it will last 75 to 80 years, ending in the late 2020s


We are heading into the second or growth quarter, when hot new industries appear, much as semiconductors and software did in the second quarter of the information economy. Thus, biotechnology will pave the way for the bio-economy era. During the next two decades, organic biotechnology will overlap with inorganic silicon infotechnology and inorganic composite materials and nanotechnologies.
During the overlap of infotechnology and biotechnology, we will be digitizing many biological processes. Up until now, four kinds of information have dominated: numbers, words, sounds, and images. But information comes in many other forms, such as smell taste, touch, imagination, and intuition. The problem is that our technologies for smell taste, and other new information forms are not yet developed enough to make them commercially viable. By the 2020s, they will be.
Smell, for example, perhaps the most primal of senses, is being digitized the way sight and sound have been. The basics of what makes a smell can be captured molecularly and expressed digitally on a chip at a reasonable price. Companies like DigiScents of Oakland, California and Ambryx of La Jolla, California have already developed digital odors. Cyrano Sciences of Pasadena, California, is developing medical-diagnostics technology that can "smell" diseases.
Imagine sending a greeting card that incorporates the smell of flowers with a written and graphic message. By the 2020s, digital movies will have their own distinctive smell prints. (You can watch Haley Joel Osment in a remake of The Beach and smell the coconut oil!) Why stop there? How does a bank smell and how does Chase smell different from Citigroup? How about retailers? This is only a tiny example of what will come.
More fundamentally, the first four industries to be infused by the bio-economy era will be pharmaceuticals, health care, agriculture, and food.
Best known are the dozens of bio-engineered drugs already on the market. Most of these save lives by treating existing problems. One of the biggest shifts of biotechnology in the decades to come then will be the way it transforms the health care paradigm from treatment to prediction and prevention. Health care today is really sick care. The sick care business model made money by filling hospital beds. Currently, we are in the managed care model. It is transitional, lasting one to two decades. Here, you make money by emptying beds. In the bio-economy, health care will work on a preventive model, making money by helping people avoid having to enter the hospital in the first place.
Basic needs are met in every economy by using the latest technologies available. In the bio-economy of the 2020s, the farm will be a super-bio-engineered place with multimillion-dollar manufacturing plants instead of fields.
Today bio-engineered milk, meat and produce are already on our supermarket shelves. Numerous varieties of corn are biogenetically altered — albeit not without challenge. One study showed that pollen from some strains of altered corn killed the larva of the monarch butterfly. Fears of Frankenfoods have caused enough of a furor to disrupt Monsanto`s life sciences strategy and help topple its chief executive officer. Such incidents will certainly multiply.
Beyond 2025, when we move into the mature bio-economy the effects and applications of biotechnology will spread into sectors seemingly unrelated to biology. In the 1950s and 1960s it was difficult to comprehend that computers would change every industry-from manufacturing to hotels to insurance — just as it is now tough to see how biotechnology will alter non-biological businesses. By the third quarter of the next economy, somewhere in the mid-century, bio-applications will seep into many of the nooks and crannies of our non-biological lives.
Problems will spread as much as benefits do. Each era produces its own dark side. The industrial era was accompanied by pollution and environmental degradation. The major problem of the information age is privacy. In the bio-economy, the issue will be ethics. Cloning, bio-engineered foods, eugenics, genetic patenting, and certainty about inherited diseases are just a few of the many developments that are already creating a storm. And the storm will intensify in the USA.
All this will make baby boomers a unique generation. They will be the first in history to span three distinct economies. Born at the end of the industrial period, they will spent their entire careers in the information age and will end their days watching their grandchildren negotiate the bio-economy.

The first four industries to be infused by the bio-economy era will be pharma, health care, agriculture, and food


Generation Xers, born after 1964, will be different. During their working years, they will experience two major economic shifts: first, from the crunching to the connecting halves of this information economy and, second, from a microwave-based connected universe to the cell-based world of biologic and bionomics. Those of you in generation Y may have to go through three!
However long you will spend in it, the bio-economy is the next one to be born and, of all economies past, present, and future, it will exert an impact that will make the info-economy look like the runt of the litter.



Dr. Stan Davis is the world-renowned guru and futurist on business in the future. He is the author of twelve books, including the best sellers Blur, 2020 Vision, and Future Perfect. He has a working relationship with Innovative Media and is scheduled to address Indian CEOs later this year on coming together of technology, biology and business and how to gain from this future.